[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations

[gdr at integrable-solutions dot net]

------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2004-04-08 22:49 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations

"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| Ahh. I see, now. You want
| 
| B::f<int>(B::X<int>&)
| 
| instead of the current
| 
| B::f<int>(A::X<int>&)
| 
| Yes, this would probably be the most consistent. So, I guess ugly it is...

Everybody is saying it is ugly, but I can't see why.
Can someone help me?

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294