[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Apr 6 09:01:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-06 09:01 -------
As the inventor of strong using, I'd say you get to pick what it means. :-)

However, it seems to me that the problem you point out is still problematic in
that it means that the mangling of the specialization of "f" differs depending
on the strongly-used namespace.  I'd think that we want the mangling to be
independent of that so that debug/optimized versions of the library get the same
mangled name.

I'm not going to hold up the first prerelease for this bug, but, since there is
going to be ABI impact, let's do try to get this fixed.

Or decide it's not a bug.

Thanks!

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list