[Bug c++/12175] [3.4 Regression] Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure: multiply defined symbols linking libstdc++.so

hubicka at ucw dot cz gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Sep 29 14:41:00 GMT 2003


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12175



------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz  2003-09-29 14:17 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure: multiply defined symbols linking libstdc++.so

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12175
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2003-09-29 11:57 -------
> Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure: mu
> 
> > The symbol in question exists and is external symbol.
> > I am not quite sure what can call notice_global_symbol on external
> > symbol, but perhaps the attached patch will help.
> 
> Yes, it does.  It gets us back to bootstrap land.

OK,
I will install the patch as obvious then together with the change to 
set the variables just once.
Thanks for testing it!
Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> > Index: varasm.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/varasm.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.386
> > diff -c -3 -p -r1.386 varasm.c
> > *** varasm.c	23 Sep 2003 19:47:00 -0000	1.386
> > --- varasm.c	28 Sep 2003 20:15:53 -0000
> > *************** notice_global_symbol (tree decl)
> > *** 1043,1048 ****
> > --- 1043,1049 ----
> >   {
> >     if ((!first_global_object_name || !weak_global_object_name)
> >         && TREE_PUBLIC (decl) && !DECL_COMMON (decl)
> > +       && !DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> >         && (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
> >   	  || (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
> >   	      && (DECL_INITIAL (decl) != 0
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list