[Bug bootstrap/12173] IRIX 6 O32 (with as) bootstrap failure due to gcc -g -E warning
neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Sep 12 05:26:00 GMT 2003
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12173
------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2003-09-12 05:26 -------
Subject: Re: IRIX 6 O32 (with as) bootstrap failure due to gcc -g -E warning
ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote:-
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12173
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2003-09-11 21:46 -------
> Subject: Re: IRIX 6 O32 (with as) bootstrap failure due to gcc -g -E warning
>
> Alexandre,
>
> I just found out that this patch of yours
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00360.html
>
> introduced this bug by passing -g options to cc1 vi cpp_options. This
> breaks bootstrap on mips-sgi-irix6.5o32 and mips-sgi-irix5.3 (i.e. any
> platform where -g isn't supported). While the warning issued is fine for
> compilation, preprocessor output is identical whether or not -g is given,
> so there should be now warning.
>
> Any idea for a proper fix?
I think the -E should be independent of -g, and should not be in
cpp_options. I was reluctant to accept this at the time Alexandre
did it.
Neil.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list