[Bug c++/13051] problem with static member and ?: operator
bangerth at dealii dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Nov 14 16:12:00 GMT 2003
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-11-14 16:12 -------
The compiler is still allowed to require a definition. That's
what the standard says, so there is no bug here.
That being said, I think Mark fixed this a while ago on
mainline. At least it compiles on mainline.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13051
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list