[Bug c++/13051] problem with static member and ?: operator

bangerth at dealii dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Nov 14 16:12:00 GMT 2003


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-11-14 16:12 -------
The compiler is still allowed to require a definition. That's
what the standard says, so there is no bug here.

That being said, I think Mark fixed this a while ago on
mainline. At least it compiles on mainline.

W.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13051



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list