C99 structure initialization in gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.3.1

[Jim Wilson]

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> With gcc-3.3.1, this works fine. With gcc-2.95.3, it complains about a 
> "missing initializer for .value".

I tried your example with gcc-2.95, and it worked fine.  Maybe you left 
something out of your bug report?

I did notice that if I added -W, I got a nice warning.  But it was only 
a warning, not an error.

We stopped maintaining gcc-2.95 a long time ago, so if there is a 
problem, it isn't going to be fixed by us.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com