[Bug c++/10576] ICE in error recovery with a wrong template parameter default and a specialization

giovannibajo@libero.it gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon May 26 14:43:00 GMT 2003


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10576


giovannibajo@libero.it changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia@physics.uc.edu
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
            Summary|[3.3 regression] ICE in     |ICE in error recovery with a
                   |error recovery with a wrong |wrong template parameter
                   |template parameter default  |default and a specialization
                   |and a specialization        |


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo@libero.it  2003-05-26 14:30 -------
Andrew, it is not a regression. Whenever you see "confused by eariler errors, 
bailing out", you should treat it as an ICE, because it is just a more friendly 
way to display an ICE in case of error recovery troubles (when tree checking is 
disabled). 
In other words, 2.95 ICEs on the code, the bug is not a regression, and it can 
be closed.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list