[Bug c++/10930] [diagnosis] g++-3.3 should warn about class/struct equivalence
bangerth@dealii.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri May 23 19:23:00 GMT 2003
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10930
bangerth@dealii.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nathan@codesourcery.com,
| |giovannibajo@libero.it
------- Additional Comments From bangerth@dealii.org 2003-05-23 19:01 -------
I tried to locate the spot in the standard that says whether
struxt X x;
is really legal only if X is declared as a "struct", rather
than declared as a "class". I was under the impression that
it wouldn't matter, and couldn't find wording.
If it really doesn't matter, then I think it's not gcc's
job to warn about stuff simply because other compilers are not
standards conforming. It's their task to fix it. It the
standard prescribes that "struct X x" is only allowed if
X is really a struct, then we have a bug in gcc (and in icc, FWIW).
Nathan, your opinion?
W.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list