[Bug libstdc++/10063] [3.4 Regression] stdio_filebuf broken
paolo@gcc.gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri May 23 09:11:00 GMT 2003
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10063
paolo@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|paolo@gcc.gnu.org |bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
------- Additional Comments From paolo@gcc.gnu.org 2003-05-23 08:59 -------
Benjamin, I'm tentatively assigning this to you as the guy currently working on
those issues.
Personally, I don't know what should we really do in order to be able to
intermix flawlessly the current stdio_filebuf - which, at variance with the old
situation ends up always issuing direct non blocking I/O syscalls, i.e., read,
write, lseek and so on - with stdio. Perhaps we should just hit the bullet and
declare that this is now possible only with stdio_sync_filebuf?
What do you think?
Paolo.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list