Bugzilla success (ID 10911)

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Wed, 21 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote:

> Thanks for the clerification. gcc-gnats used to take
> anything with Re: bug# + name and tack it onto the end
> of the report.

That is, Re: c/12345 (etc.) or just c/12345 beginning the subject line.  
Messages from users responding to previous communications from GNATS will
have the Re:, CVS log messages from log_accum wouldn't have had it (but I
presume log_accum has been / will be updated for Bugzilla, it checks for
the bug being in that number and category in the GNATS database before
sending the mails).

> > I'll make it verify the report has required fields
> > filled in, so that 
> > it doesn't create pointless bugs.

The creating "pending" bug reports for spam is the one bit of behaviour we
don't want emulated.  Messages with PR numbers should get filed
appropriately.  Any messages that can't be handled should get bounced.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk