Old Java PRs
Mon May 12 18:20:00 GMT 2003
Jeff Sturm writes:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Unless I misunderstand this PR, it is fixed by the new inliner (except for
> > > the bytecode frontend, which still does not emit whole functions as
> > > trees).
> > It isn't. The new inliner still will not inline functions until they
> > have been expanded.
> Unfortunately the PR doesn't include a test case.
> So it looks as though you're right, though I could swear I've seen this
> work before. My understanding of the tree inliner is that it does not
> require expanding the inlined bodies to RTL, but I don't remember the
Given that I wrote the inliner, I do. :-)
The problem is that binding contours for variables are generated when
the functions are expanded.
More information about the Gcc-bugs