Bug Digest 5/11

[Dara Hazeghi]

--- Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it> wrote:
> Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
> wrote:
> 
> >> Close
> >> 6680 (problem has changed, and I asked the
> submitter to open a new
> >> report for the new problem, can someone confirm
> if this is the correct
> >> way to do things?)
> > Don't know so didn't touch.
> 
> It's the correct way, but Dara, can you please send
> a mail to the audit
> trail explaining the situation? This way, we can
> close it with a proper
> reason being logged.
> 
> > All of these _are_ open AFAICT.  Did you mean
> "analyzed"?  Most of these
> > are just "confirmed" so I'll leave them for now. 
> I'm sure Volkert and
> > Wolfgang read this, let's see what they think.
> 
> 
> I took care of them. Some could be switched to
> analyzed, the others are:
> 
> >> 6767

Should stay open 'til we can get Ludovico back to
bootstrap-land, to check.

> >> 6717

Leave "open" I guess. Someone with better knowledge
than me will have to determine when this is analyzed.

> >> 5903

Ditto.

> >> 5739

Ditto.
> 
> This still needs analysys
> 
> >> 6941
> 
> Need minimal testcase.

Actually for Ada, this testcase is fine (I'm learning
how to compile Ada, wheee...).

Dara

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com