Bug Digest 5/9

[Dara Hazeghi]

Hello,

my daily list of bug reports to modify or close, some may be from 
yesterday's too. Thanks to everyone, especially Wolfgang and Giovanni 
for doing all the GNATs stuff for me, since I don't have write access.

Cheers,

Dara

Please mark as confirmed (and where appropriate, include version 
numbers in PR title):
7204 (3.3 and 3.4)
7594 (3.3 only)
7595 (3.3 and 3.4)
8081 (3.3 and 3.4)
8600 (3.3 and 3.4)
8623 (3.3 and 3.4)
8869 (3.3 and 3.4)
8985 (3.3 and 3.4)
9085 (3.3 and 3.4)

Please close as resolved:
2865 - reported fixed by Bruce Korb
3805
5099 - submitter says its okay to close, I can't reproduce the bug on 
mainline or 3.3
5363 - tested natively, and appears fixed
5405 - problem fixed in 3.3 and 3.4
6469 - cannot reproduce the error on 3.2, 3.3 or 3.4
7627
8364 - reproduced in 3.2, but fixed in 3.3 and 3.4
9176 - patch provided is for 3.2, code in question doesn't exist in 
3.3, so PR doesn't apply
9268 - this is a binutils issue, as Eric points out
9431 - solved according to submitter

Change status to suspended or closed
7254 - target obsolete in 3.3, and will be removed in 3.4

Please change status to feedback
5519
6552
6584
6606
6661
6941
6954
7733
7985
8010
8303
8309
8554
9113
9697
10164
10239

Change status from feedback to open (or analyzed, whichever is deemed 
appropriate)
10620
8751
8303
8082
7881
7198
7093
7076
6522
4784

In feedback for a long time without response (let me know if I should 
stop doing this, or if the cutoff should be different. 2 months seems 
good to me, because if we've not heard from them in 2 months, I rather 
doubt we will...)


9980 - 2 months
9956 - 2 months
9933 - 2 months
9904 - 2 months
9816 - 2 months
9720 - 2 months
9686 - 2 months
9669 - 2 months
9592 - 3 months
9544 - 3 months
9508 - 2 months
9495 - 3 months
9417 - 3 months
9303 - 2 months
9205 - 4 months, Richard Earnshaw believes it's fixed
9204 - 2 months
9111 - 5 months, no feedback, same issue described in 7076
9110 - 4 months, no testcase or feedback
8717 - 2 months
8421 - 4 months
8125 - 7 months
7936 - 2 months, no testcase whatsoever
7933 - 5 months
7893 - 2 months
7867 - 5 months
7645 - 2 months
7571 - 2 months
7392 - 2 months, successful builds exist from this platform
7269 - 2 months
6895 - 2 months +, looks like a platform for which we have numerous 
successful builds
6537 - 2+ months, Eric thinks it's fixed
6524 - 4 months, a very old version of gcc, probably as assembler bug 
too
6407 - 2+ months, reported fixed by several individuals
4977 - 5 months
3313 - 6 months

Other questions:
8440 - We no longer ICE, so this is miscategorized. However with 
optimization, the assembler rejects the code, and without optimization, 
the compiler does. I think we should be consistent about the issue, but 
this is clearly beyond my level of expertise.

7892 - looks like the proposed solution works, but also that original 
submitter hasn't confirmed. So is this a bug?

5256 - I've reproduce the bug on 3.0.3, but not on 3.0.4, 3.2, 3.3 or 
mainline, should I still ask for user feedback?