c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

> To be fair, the code is legal in 3.3 because of the implicit typename
> extension. I guess this bug should be kept open (not analyzed - there is 
> no testcase), in case someone wants to fix the ICE in the 3.3 branch.

Well, why? The code ICEd since at least 2.95, so it's not a regression. 
It's fixed on mainline. Bugs that are not regressions are not going to be 
fixed on 3.3 branch, so why keep it open?

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/