c/10225: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly

rth@gcc.gnu.org rth@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Mar 27 11:12:00 GMT 2003


Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
Responsible-Changed-By: rth
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    .
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    It was a bug that 3.2 accepted this.  For 3.3 and beyond this
    is accepted with the -fms-extensions switch, but not otherwise.
    
    I'll admit the documentation needs clarification, but it's
    also true that you'll not find this "feature" documented
    anywhere in the 3.2 tree.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10225



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list