c/10225: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
rth@gcc.gnu.org
rth@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Mar 27 11:12:00 GMT 2003
Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
Responsible-Changed-By: rth
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
State-Changed-Why:
It was a bug that 3.2 accepted this. For 3.3 and beyond this
is accepted with the -fms-extensions switch, but not otherwise.
I'll admit the documentation needs clarification, but it's
also true that you'll not find this "feature" documented
anywhere in the 3.2 tree.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10225
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list