On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:33:02 +0100, Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> wrote: > From your analysis, I would suspect that this PR is a duplicate > of high-priority PR opt/8414. Is there any way to verify this? I don't think so; it doesn't look like the loop in 8414 only has a single iteration. Jason