c++/5390: Libiberty fails to demangle multi-digit template parameters.

Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
Fri Mar 7 16:25:00 GMT 2003


Carlo,
first this: When I complained that this PR has been sitting idle despite 
the fact that it has a patch, I complained to the ones who are in power of 
reviewing and applying patches. That it has not been reviewed is not your 
fault. We are grateful for people sending in patches, and I, too, am 
embarrassed if we turn them down by just not taking notice of their 
work...

> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> > State-Changed-Why:
> >     Carlo, this report has been sitting idly for a year now.
> >     What is the present state? Is it still unsolved, or did
> >     your patch go in?
> [...]
> 
> c++filt of 3.3 does not demangle the correct mangled names (at least the
> ones I tried) - while it does demangle the old (wrong) mangled names. 

As time progresses, this is becoming more and more irrelevant: as far 
as I understand you,
- gcc since 3.0 has a different mangling scheme, which isn't concerned in 
  this PR 
- gcc up to 2.95 has never generated the cases that your patch addresses
- gcc 2.95 is certainly not going to be fixed to generate them any more
- gcc 2.95 is slowly dying out.

The question thus is: if people are not overly interested in your patch 
(which is regrettable, but apparently the case), then we can as well close 
the PR. Since if we don't, we'll ask the same question again in a year, 
and then people will care even less about 2.95.

What's your opinion on this?

Thanks
  Wolfgang

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                              www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/




More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list