Bug summary notations (Was Re: [Bug target/11260] [alpha] 'output_operand: floating constant misused' with sqrt(0.0) and -mcpu=ev6)
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Fri Jun 20 01:36:00 GMT 2003
I'm confused about the need to put [alpha] in front of the summary here.
Remind me again why it makes sense?
You can search for host/target/build containing alpha quite easily.
At least one of these will show up on the summary.
If even *this* isn't enough, you can use a keyword.
So why is it in the summary?
It's not like regression tracking, which arguably has a need for it.
On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 08:48 PM, falk at debian dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11260
>
>
> falk at debian dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Summary|code causes 'output_operand:|[alpha]
> 'output_operand:
> |floating constant misused' |floating constant
> misused'
> |under |with sqrt(0 dot 0)
> and -
> | |mcpu=ev6
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-06-20
> 00:48 -------
> Here's a C test case:
>
> double f(void)
> {
> return sqrt(0.0);
> }
>
> The ICE does not happen with mainline, most likely because of Roger's
> sqrt
> constant folding stuff.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list