[Bug bootstrap/11169] bootstrap failure after passing configure options

Fri Jun 13 11:04:00 GMT 2003

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11169

jeroen.dobbelaere@acunia.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

------- Additional Comments From jeroen.dobbelaere@acunia.com  2003-06-13 11:03 -------
Status update :
- The patch resolved the bootstrap problem I've been having (thanks !).
  I also think that (currently) this is the right solution.

- Latest results are available on : 
  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/msg00765.html>

- Will this patch be applied to binutils ?

A question :
- what is the benefit of having two 'soft-float' versions ?
(one with fpa ordening, one with vfp ordening ?) Won't this just add more
confusion ?