[Bug optimization/10679] [3.3/3.4] --param min-inline-insns not honoured

Wed Jun 4 20:44:00 GMT 2003

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10679

------- Additional Comments From rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de  2003-06-04 20:44 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3/3.4] --param min-inline-insns not
 honoured

On 4 Jun 2003, dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10679
>
>
> dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>      Ever Confirmed|                            |1
>   GCC build triplet|                            |i686-pc-linux-gnu
>    GCC host triplet|                            |i686-pc-linux-gnu
>  GCC target triplet|                            |i686-linux-pc-gnu
>    Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-06-04 19:29:56
>                date|                            |
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-04 19:29 -------
> Confirmed. Richard, I didn't follow the thread on gcc-patches completely. Is this now superseded
> by __attribute__ leafify? Thanks.

No. __attribute__((leafify)) is additional and also not accepted, nor
commented on in concept. (Though the actual patch I submitted
accidentially removes the offending check of this PR).

Richard.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.