[Bug bootstrap/9631] [hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu] [gcc-3.2.2] fails to bootstrap

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9631


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-02 20:02 -------
Randolph,

with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030601), I can't reproduce your failure on a powerpc-darwin 
x hppa64-linux cross compiler. Your testcase seems to compile fine:
bash-2.05a$ branch/objdir/gcc/cc1 -quiet bug.c 
bash-2.05a$ branch/objdir/gcc/cc1 --version
GNU C version 3.3.1 20030602 (prerelease) (hppa64-linux)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.1 20020420 (prerelease).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
bash-2.05a$ mainline/objdir/gcc/cc1 -quiet bug.c
bash-2.05a$ mainline/objdir/gcc/cc1 --version   
GNU C version 3.4 20030602 (experimental) (hppa64-linux)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.1 20020420 (prerelease).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
bash-2.05a$ cat bug.c   
struct SjLj_Function_Context { unsigned data[4]; };

I did not configure with --enable-debug or --enable-sjlj-exceptions or --disable-threads, but I 
don't see why those would make a difference.

Sorry to keep asking, but can you check again with current gcc 3.3 branch? Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.