new-ra weirdness

[tm]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Michael Matz wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net wrote:
> 
> > version: CVS head today
> 
> Additionally to what Daniel already wrote, I want to ask if you indeed
> tried this on mainline instead of new-regalloc-branch?
> 
> 
> Ciao,
> Michael.

This is on mainline.

The problem persists even after I set MEMORY_MOVE_COST to 999 as suggested
by Daniel. So although the MEMORY_MOVE_COST is probably broken, there
appear to be secondary issues.

Toshi