[Bug optimization/11421] [3.4 regression] vtables are not emitted in unit-at-a-time mode

[jh at suse dot cz]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11421



------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2003-07-03 17:30 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] vtables are not emitted in unit-at-a-time mode

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de  2003-07-03 17:21 -------
> Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] vtables are not emitted in unit-at-a-time mode
> 
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:49:22PM -0000, jh at suse dot cz wrote:
> > too bad :(
> > I am leaving and won't be online for day or two in few hours, so if you
> > have some info early, I will be able to take a look into it, but
> > otherwise it will take some time.
> 
> I'm trying to distil a short example but this is harder than I thought.
> Probably I won't manage to finish in a few hours, so it's probably
> better to postpone it. I'm in no hurry at all; I just wanted to report
> the problems as soon as I ran across them.
> 
> > What kind of unresolved symbols you get?  Are these still vtables or
> > something else?
> 
> It's still the vtables that are missing.
OK, please try my other patch.  In the case it won't help it would be
nice if you was able to figure out why the vtable must be emit and told
maybe_emit_vtables to mark is as needed (this is the place touched by my
next-to-last patch), in case you want to have some GCC fun :)

Honza
> 
> Thanks,
>   Martin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.