c++/4205
Nathanael Nerode
neroden@twcny.rr.com
Fri Jan 3 12:09:00 GMT 2003
This has a further perverse piece of behavior not noted before:
the following code will, correctly, give an error!
--
template<typename F> void quirk(F f) {
(*f) (1);
}
// void foo(int i, int j = 5){}
void bar(int i, int j) {}
int main() {
// quirk(&foo);
quirk(&bar);
}
--
And so will this:
--
template<typename F> void quirk(F f) {
(*f) (1);
}
void foo(int i, int j = 5){}
void bar(int i, int j) {}
int main() {
quirk(&bar);
quirk(&foo);
}
--
As long as "foo" is seen *first*, it 'immunizes' all subsequent functions.
But not otherwise. This is really bad behavior.
It may possibly be related to c++/3784, which has similar "first one seen
controls everyone else" behavior, though I doubt it.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list