ada/9406: Documentation suggestion

[Geert Bosch]

On Sunday, Feb 23, 2003, at 07:16 America/New_York, Simon Wright wrote:

> Now (3) and (4) *cannot be right* because this is in a section where
> *there is no ada main program*, OK?
> ...
> I see your point about partitions though I must say it was far from
> obvious that I should be looking there. Perhaps the UM should have a
> reference to the RM.

I now see what you mean. I agree that the language here could be
improved. Actually, the language from the Ada RM that I quoted seems
to be pretty clear, so I think we should borrow from that or indeed
put in a link (or both).

   -Geert