Bug#153965: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

[Matthias Klose]

Not yet fixed in the 3.2 and 3.3 branches. Ok to checkin, if testsuite
doesn't show new regressions on the branches?

You write:
  "This could be done better with the tree optimizers on tree-ssa
  branch, as we won't have thrown away most of the line number
  information yet."
Can we keep open this report, maybe at a lower priority?

rth@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
> 
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
> Responsible-Changed-By: rth
> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb  6 00:39:25 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
>     .
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> State-Changed-By: rth
> State-Changed-When: Thu Feb  6 00:39:25 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01914.html
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8602
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org