middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Thu Feb 20 08:08:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The structure does include two fields of type 'unsigned' (the fact that
> they are bit fields doesn't alter their type as I view it). And, as
It does alter their type; the standard is clear on this (and there are C90
DRs confirming it). (There are bugs in GCC relating to the types of
bit-fields; Neil Booth had a patch for them but it was reverted because of
problems with debug info generation.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list