middle-end/9725: Invalid dependency determination

Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Thu Feb 20 08:08:00 GMT 2003

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jan Beulich wrote:

> The structure does include two fields of type 'unsigned' (the fact that
> they are bit fields doesn't alter their type as I view it). And, as

It does alter their type; the standard is clear on this (and there are C90
DRs confirming it).  (There are bugs in GCC relating to the types of
bit-fields; Neil Booth had a patch for them but it was reverted because of
problems with debug info generation.)

Joseph S. Myers

More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list