[Bug fortran/5900] Lapack regressions for g77 3.1

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-08-23 03:35:27
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-23 03:35 -------
Here are the results I get on the mainline (20030822) on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 
(which does not have the x86 problem of exucessive precission):

cgd.out: CGV drivers:     59 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DES:    2 out of  3264 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DSX:    2 out of  3494 tests failed to pass the threshold
dgd.out: DXV drivers:    200 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
dsep.out: DST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
sgd.out: SXV drivers:     37 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZGV drivers:     60 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZXV drivers:     24 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
total  failures 370 which is better than what 3.1 was on i686-pc-linux-gnu but still needs 
get where 2.95.2 is.