[Bug c++/11879] Thinks constructor call is a declaration.

[lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11879


lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-11 13:04 -------
Not a bug.  Although the code
  SetUnexpected(Foo);
can be viewed as a declaration of variable name 'Foo' with
type 'SetUnexpected' or a type conversion from 'Foo' to 
'SetUnexpected'.  According to the standard, when such
ambiguity appears, it must be resolved to a declaration.
So GCC's behavios is correct.