[Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[mruff at chiaro dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797



------- Additional Comments From mruff at chiaro dot com  2003-08-05 00:29 -------
Subject: RE:  Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

We already have thanks... We were just curious if
this behavior change is expected. Since it's invalid code
I think YES would be the proper response... I'll let
Steve pursue the out of line definition.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
> [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:23 PM
> To: Michael Ruff
> Subject: [Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous
> versions
> 
> 
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* 
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc 
> dot edu  2003-08-05 00:22 -------
> Use inline then as I had suggested.
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>