c++/10511: tt.cpp:61: Internal compiler error in decay_conversion, at cp/typeck.c:1679
reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Mon Apr 28 14:32:00 GMT 2003
Synopsis: tt.cpp:61: Internal compiler error in decay_conversion, at cp/typeck.c:1679
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: reichelt
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 13:05:37 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed on 3.3 branch and mainline.
The bug is still present in gcc 3.2.3, but since the 3.2 branch
is closed now, there'll be no fix for the 3.2 branch.
With 3.3 branch or mainline one gets 2 error messages instead of the ICE:
PR10511.cc: In member function `void Zoo::B::Fooey(Zoo::A*)':
PR10511.cc:59: error: assuming pointer to member `void Zoo::B::TFUNC_B(Zoo::A*)
[with Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_aa = &Zoo::A::m_mem1, Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ab =
&Zoo::A::m_mem2, Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ac = &Zoo::A::m_mem3,
Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_ba = &Zoo::B::m_b1, Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bb = &Zoo::B::m_b2,
Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bc = &Zoo::B::m_b3]'
PR10511.cc:59: error: (a pointer to member can only be formed with `&
Zoo::B::TFUNC_B(Zoo::A*) [with Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_aa = &Zoo::A::m_mem1,
Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ab = &Zoo::A::m_mem2, Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ac =
&Zoo::A::m_mem3, Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_ba = &Zoo::B::m_b1, Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bb
= &Zoo::B::m_b2, Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bc = &Zoo::B::m_b3]')
and
PR10511.cc: In member function `void Zoo::B::TFUNC_B(Zoo::A*) [with
Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_aa = &Zoo::A::m_mem1, Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ab =
&Zoo::A::m_mem2, Zoo::A*Zoo::A::*w_ac = &Zoo::A::m_mem3,
Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_ba = &Zoo::B::m_b1, Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bb = &Zoo::B::m_b2,
Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*w_bc = &Zoo::B::m_b3]':
PR10511.cc:59: instantiated from here
PR10511.cc:52: error: invalid use of member (did you forget the `&' ?)
PR10511.cc:52: error: comparison between distinct pointer types `
Zoo::A*Zoo::B::*' and `Zoo::A*' lacks a cast
After fixing the first bug by writing
ff gg = &B::TFUNC_B<...
instead of
ff gg = TFUNC_B<...
the ICE on the 3.2 branch disappears and the second error message is printed.
The second error message is discussed in PR 10514, so I won't comment on
that one here.
BTW,
the ICE on the 3.2 branch can be shown with the following shorter example:
===========================snip here================================
struct A
{
struct B
{
template <int> void foo () {}
typedef void (B::* fptr)();
void bar() { fptr f = foo<0>; } // should be: fptr f = &B::foo<0>;
};
};
===========================snip here================================
Regards,
Volker
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10511
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list