[tree-ssa] Bootstrap fails with undefined reference to find_reachable_lable
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Thu Apr 24 20:03:00 GMT 2003
In message <200304242117.52919.aj@suse.de>, Andreas Jaeger writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>bootstrap of current tree-ssa fails on i686-linux-gnu for me with:
>
>/builds/gcc/gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/builds/gcc/gcc/gcc/
>- -B/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/bin/
>- -B/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
>/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/include -isystem
>/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2
>- -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototyp
>es
>- -isystem ./include -I. -I. -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/.
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/config
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../include
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee/libcompat
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee
>- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee/points-to -g0
>- -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions
>- -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-omit-frame-pointer \
> -c /cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \
> -o crtbegin.o
>c-simplify.o(.text+0x1022): In function `simplify_cleanup':
>/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c:446: undefined reference t
>o
>`find_reachable_label'
>c-simplify.o(.text+0x1b4d): In function `simplify_if_stmt':
>/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c:704: undefined reference t
>o
>`find_reachable_label'
>c-simplify.o(.text+0x1c11):/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c
>:715:
>undefined reference to `find_reachable_label'
find_reachable_label is defined in c-semantics. Maybe you should verify
that c-semantics is up-to-date and contains a suitable definition.
Alternately, is it possible you're trying to build something wacky
which uses c-simplify.o, but not c-semantics.o?
jeff
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list