[tree-ssa] Bootstrap fails with undefined reference to find_reachable_lable

law@redhat.com law@redhat.com
Thu Apr 24 20:03:00 GMT 2003


In message <200304242117.52919.aj@suse.de>, Andreas Jaeger writes:
 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 >Hash: SHA1
 >
 >
 >bootstrap of current tree-ssa fails on i686-linux-gnu for me with:
 >
 >/builds/gcc/gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/builds/gcc/gcc/gcc/ 
 >- -B/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/bin/ 
 >- -B/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem 
 >/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/include -isystem 
 >/opt/gcc/tree-ssa-20020619-branch/i686-suse-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 
 >- -DIN_GCC    -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototyp
 >es 
 >- -isystem ./include  -I. -I. -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/. 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/config 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../include 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee/libcompat 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee 
 >- -I/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/../libbanshee/points-to  -g0 
 >- -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions 
 >- -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-omit-frame-pointer \
 >   -c /cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \
 >  -o crtbegin.o
 >c-simplify.o(.text+0x1022): In function `simplify_cleanup':
 >/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c:446: undefined reference t
 >o 
 >`find_reachable_label'
 >c-simplify.o(.text+0x1b4d): In function `simplify_if_stmt':
 >/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c:704: undefined reference t
 >o 
 >`find_reachable_label'
 >c-simplify.o(.text+0x1c11):/cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-simplify.c
 >:715: 
 >undefined reference to `find_reachable_label'
find_reachable_label is defined in c-semantics.  Maybe you should verify
that c-semantics is up-to-date and contains a suitable definition.

Alternately, is it possible you're trying to build something wacky
which uses c-simplify.o, but not c-semantics.o?


jeff



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list