gcc preprocessor bug ?

[Diego Novillo]

On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 01:49, Nilmoni Deb wrote:

> Not quite. I just used the term compiler in a more inclusive way.
> 
> Anyway, its obvious that the preprocessor is probably substituting "10;"
> for MAX everywhere so that line 11 is getting an error later from the
> compiler. Would it be too much to expect the preprocessor to handle it
> more wisely ?
> 
The preprocessor has done *exactly* what you told it to do.


Diego.