ada/6558: [mainline regression] Wrongly reverted patches
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Tue Oct 29 05:28:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> My understanding is that the only patches at issue were those lost
> when this change occurred:
>
> 2002-03-07 Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com>
Yes. It's all patches from non-ACT people to the FSF tree before then
that need to be checked to make sure they are still in the tree or have
been superseded by subsequent changes.
I think someone found an example (which may or may not now have been
unreverted individually) that wasn't among the examples I gave of patches
wrongly reverted by this change, so it is necessary to do that check
rather than relying on my list.
> I would like to point out that it is just shy of eight months since
> this happened, and there has been no indication that Mr. Bosch has
> lifted a finger to address the problem that he created (beyond
> claiming that it would be fixed soon).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list