ada/6558: [mainline regression] Wrongly reverted patches

Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk
Tue Oct 29 05:28:00 GMT 2002


On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:

> My understanding is that the only patches at issue were those lost
> when this change occurred:
> 
> 2002-03-07  Geert Bosch  <bosch@gnat.com>

Yes.  It's all patches from non-ACT people to the FSF tree before then
that need to be checked to make sure they are still in the tree or have
been superseded by subsequent changes.

I think someone found an example (which may or may not now have been
unreverted individually) that wasn't among the examples I gave of patches
wrongly reverted by this change, so it is necessary to do that check
rather than relying on my list.

> I would like to point out that it is just shy of eight months since
> this happened, and there has been no indication that Mr. Bosch has
> lifted a finger to address the problem that he created (beyond
> claiming that it would be fixed soon).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list