c++/8279: REGRESSION: failure to find a matching function in
Wolfgang Bangerth
bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
Mon Oct 21 14:08:00 GMT 2002
> Even if gcc's behavior is correct, the diagnostic is puzzling:
>
> PREFIX/include/c++/3.2.1/bits/stream_iterator.h:141: no
> match for `std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >& << const
> std::pair<std::string, unsigned int>&' operator
>
> when there is what appears to be an exact match. Strategies to come up
> with a better diagnostic (e.g. tell the user why the function s/he
> intended to use isn't accepted) would be wlcome.
Maybe a first simple step would be to change the message to say
no match for `...' found during name lookup
Indicating that there _might_ even be such a name, but that it just was
not found. This would at least give a clue as to what may be going wrong.
Regards
Wolfgang
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list