preprocessor behavoir change with -ansi in assembly????
Fri Nov 22 13:53:00 GMT 2002
I will examine this and try to get back to you before the new year. I
do not want to cause any side affects.
Thanks for your input,
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 13:46, Neil Booth wrote:
> Neil Booth wrote:-
> > Sean McNeil wrote:-
> > > In case my statement is unclear... :)
> > >
> > > Since there is no such thing as ANSI assembly, specifying -ansi in this
> > > case should be a NOOP. Just like all cases using a flag that isn't
> > > related to the particular language.
> > No, we've started rejecting invalid flags that we used to accept.
> > If -std=c89 doesn't work, how does one compile C code in a file whose
> > extension happens to match that of assembler? It becomes impossible.
> That wasn't a good example, never mind.
> I remain wary of changes in this area. Why don't you propose a patch
> that you have tested?
More information about the Gcc-bugs