libstdc++/4436: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;

[paolo@gcc.gnu.org]

Synopsis: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Triaged.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Indeed, the relevant DR is #280, which however is still in
    the *open* state: this means that, for the time being, the
    ISO Standard holds and there is *no* requirement for
    reverse_iterator to be comparable to const
    reverse_iterator. In the current state of affairs, with
    both libstdc++-v3 and other conforming implementations
    the line 'di != d.rend();' of your testcase cannot be
    compiled.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4436