libstdc++/6518: ???

[bkoz@gcc.gnu.org]

Synopsis: ???

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 15 07:36:57 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Mine.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed May 15 07:36:57 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    
    Yikes. I've reproduced this on mainline and the gcc-3.1 branch. What do do with s when NULL is not specified: I've asked the library reflector about this. In the meantime, I've the following patch, which sets failbit and doesn't 
    crash. Let me know what you think.
    
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg01205.html
    
    Thanks,
    benjamin

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6518