target/6569: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite regression in compile/20011119-2.c

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Wednesday, May 08, 2002 08:35:07 AM -0400 "Kaveh R. Ghazi" 
<ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:

>  > From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>  >
>  > This patch will fix it; I'm testing on x86 now, and if someone can
>  > kick off a SPARC run that would be great.  As a special bonus, this
>  > also makes the warnings come out in the right place consistently.
>
> Mark,
>
> Your patch made the compile/20011119-2.c failures go away, but I get
> some new ones:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-3.c weak declaration (test for warnings, line 37)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-3.c weak declaration (test for warnings, line 59)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-3.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-5.c weak declaration (test for warnings, line 42)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-5.c (test for excess errors)
>
>   Excess errors:
>   gcc.dg/weak-3.c:42:
>   warning: weak declaration of `ffoo1c' after first use results in
> unspecified behavior   gcc.dg/weak-3.c:67:
>   warning: weak declaration of `ffoo1f' after first use results in
> unspecified behavior
>
>   gcc.dg/weak-5.c:47:
>   warning: weak declaration of `vfoo1c' after first use results in
> unspecified behavior
>
> I suspect that the warnings just moved so it may be an issue of simply
> fixing the testcases if the new location is correct.

Yes, that's correct; the warnings actually come at a better place now;
both Franz and I like the new location better.

Thank you very much for the testing cycles; I'll commit the patch
shortly.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com