two dfa problems

[law@redhat.com]

 In message <20020503.163505.122272470.davem@redhat.com>, "David S. Miller" 
writes:
 >    From: law@redhat.com
 >    Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 17:43:51 -0600
 > 
 >    I use -fsched-verbose=99 to see what's happening in more detail.    
 > 
 > Note, I get memory corruption in the current mainline
 > when using sched-verbose on, for example, a test reload1.i
 > on Sparc.
 > 
 > The memory corruption results in verify_local_live_at_start
 > triggering an abort().  The abort() goes away if I turn
 > -fsched-verbose=999 back off.
Weird.  I've been using the sched-verbose stuff pretty heavily without any
problems of that nature.  Then again, I haven't been using the cycle display
(I've mostly been looking at priorities, costs, units used and the movement
of insns between the queued, ready and waiting lists.)
jeff