7247/optimization: copy constructor missing when inlining enabled for i386
Ewgenij Gawrilow
gawrilow@math.TU-Berlin.DE
Thu Jul 11 08:00:00 GMT 2002
>>>>> "Lu" == H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
Lu> Can you try
Lu> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-06/msg02277.html
Lu> Jason, it looks like your patch doesn't catch this one.
Exactly. Nothing has changed.
By the way, I didn't see any place the named return value optimization
could come into play, more likely the leaf/sibling routine optimization:
all the functions comprising the mis-compiled expression consist of
lone "return" statements creating temporary objects. But you must
know about this better...
With best regards,
Ewgenij Gawrilow
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list