libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator

[bkoz@gcc.gnu.org]

Synopsis: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul  3 09:22:56 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    I'm going to give this to you...
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed Jul  3 09:22:56 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Is there a survey of existing practice for this issue? Can all but the reverse_iterator bits go in now, since that will have ABI-impacting effects?
    
    -benjamin

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7186