Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?

[Richard Henderson]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> Your comment implies that the original use was incorrect as printf
> style was assumed by whoever wrote the code and that things like %%R
> where meant to be output as %R.

Exactly why I suggested making output_operand_lossage take printf
arguments rather than fix them all up.

> If so, only those messages that use a single '%' would have to be
> changed, right?

Yes.


r~