PATCH: Re: ICE in 920624-1.c with -O3 -funroll-loops on vax-dec-ultrix4.3

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Feb 4 19:32:00 GMT 2002


On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:35:52PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Agreed.  As I mentioned, I'm extremely tempted to burn tonight and
> get rid of having a separate insn for the ADDR_VEC/ADDR_DIFF_VEC.
> 
> Thoughts?

If you can make it work, I'm all for it.

BTW, another edge case you should consider in doing this is
s390, which dumps the tablejump label into the constant pool.
I don't think there's an integrated sim for that one, but 
perhaps faking it via "ln -s /bin/true s390-linux-run" and
checking that the execute tests compile is a good enough 
sanity check.


r~



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list