Is regs_ever_live valid in prologue? (SPARC quirk?)

Jim Wilson wilson@redhat.com
Tue Apr 30 12:21:00 GMT 2002


>Actually, this is too obvious to be the issue.
>What is the problem actually?

I don't care enough to look.  It could be related to the point you made.
The renumbering and the optimizing away of the parameter could be causing
things to get a little confused.

Jim



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list