Your Jan 8th, 2001 rtlanal.c:note_stores change

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Apr 15 09:58:00 GMT 2002


On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:26:39AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> (All uses of this PARALLEL reg thing use it for consequetive hard
> registers, there is not reason to generalize it to allow arbitray
> disjoint sets of registers to be described).

This is false.  Look at a structure that contains floats
and integers on sparc64.


r~



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list