va_arg regression from 2.95.2 to 3.1

[Schirmer, Hartmut]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:rth@redhat.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 11:54 AM
> To: Nathan Sidwell
> Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Schirmer, Hartmut; 'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org';
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: va_arg regression from 2.95.2 to 3.1
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:24:07PM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > "Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the argument is correct, and that this call to 
> va_arg should be
> > > considered the same as a call where the types turn out to 
> be incompatible
> > > at runtime (except here, the runtime type cannot be 
> compatible).  It ought
> > > to be a mandatory warning (not pedwarn, not error); and 
> should either be
> > > compiled into a call to abort() or be treated as a call 
> to va_arg with the
> > > promoted type followed by conversion to the type specified.
> > I agree.
> 
> Ok, two's good enough.  Addressed as follows.
> 
> 
> r~
> 

Thanks.

Hartmut