Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries.

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Sep 28, 2001, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
> | On Sep 28, 2001, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
> | 
> | > I was wondering, how can it be that `string' has a different
> | > mangling on different compilers/machines?  Isn't that a bug?
> | 
> | Well, it can be argued that they are actually two different classes,

> If they are really considered to be two different classes, then
> "std::string" is a truly bad choice.  

Well, using different compilers can always result in different
mangling for std::string.  In this case, it's the same version of GCC
built with different configure arguments, but the configure arguments
still make them different compilers.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me