Your change to final.c

[Richard Earnshaw]

> >     Your latest change to final.c breaks the ARM bootstrap.  There's nothing 
> >     in the spec for an ASM that says that the number of references to the 
> >     operands must be less that MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS (which is an internal 
> >     definition anyway), so we are overflowing this array when we try to output 
> >     the following ASM statement:
> > 
> > 
> > I thought there was.  Doesn't reload depend on this?  What is the proper
> > bound, then?
> 
> Well, an asm statement has a limit on the number of distinct operands that 
> may be passed to it (10),

Actually, that is no-longer correct.   The number of distinct operands can 
now be up to 30, since RTH added a named-operand mechanism.

That still doesn't mean that we should restrict the number of references 
to 30; it's perfectly legitimate to reference an operand more than once.