dwarf2 bug. Was Re: reorder bug in 3.0

[Richard Henderson]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:00:07AM -0700, Andrew Macleod wrote:
> When the outer function is being processed, the nested function is not 
> referenced in either the BLOCK_VARS or BLOCK_SUBBLOCKS lists, so it
> never gets its parent field set.

Hmm.  I wonder if the original BLOCK that did contain the
nested function was removed due to being empty.

Look for the thing before the calls to remove_unnecessary_notes.


r~